7 models · 38 tests from 4 countries

Robot vacuums: tests from four countries

Robot vacuum-and-mop combos with a dock are judged very differently by labs and editorial reviewers: models that shine in magazine reviews often get only a “satisfactory” from Stiftung Warentest. We merge the published verdicts from Germany, the UK, France and the US and show the source, country and original verdict for every test.

Top rated
Dreame X50 Ultra Complete
Tests reviewed
38 across 4 countries
Not from the UK
28 of those tests
Last updated
20 August 2026
Prices last checked
6 October 2026

Side-by-side comparison

Close comparison
Dreame X50 Ultra Complete Rank 1 of 7Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni Rank 4 of 7
Overall score86 82
Test basis 5 tests from 3 countries 4 tests from 3 countries
Vacuuming100 no test value
Mopping90 no test value
Navigationno test valueno test value
Ease of use95 no test value
Verdict by test country
DE Germany7889
FR France92–
UK United Kingdom9590
US USA–66
Price United KingdomAmazon.co.ukAmazon.co.uk
Strengths
  • Very good vacuuming on hard floors and carpet (Stiftung Warentest 1/2026)
  • Climbs thresholds up to 6 cm and retracts its lidar turret (TechRadar)
  • Quiet, low-maintenance dock (Presse-citron)
  • Very effective roller mop, excellent suction and edge cleaning (TechRadar)
  • Feature-rich dock, many automatic functions (CHIP Online)
Weaknesses
  • Mopping and everyday practicality only satisfactory (Stiftung Warentest)
  • Patchy object recognition, battery drains quickly (TechRadar)
  • Very short battery life, navigation not fully reliable (CHIP Online)
  • Loud dock emptying, running costs for bags and detergent (TechRadar)
Height8,9 cm9,8 cm
Max. runtime150 min145 min
Suction power20.000 Pa18.000 Pa

Same source, several devices

What the same publication concluded about the selected devices – original verdicts.

SourceDreame X50 Ultra CompleteEcovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni
CHIP Onlinesehr gut (1,2) 02/2025 · as reported by testberichte.degut (1,6) 03/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de
TechRadar4.5/5 07/20254.5/5 08/2025
Your ranking

What matters to you?

Presets
Sum 100, normalised to 100% internally.
Which test countries count
Brands

Where the tests disagree.

Each dot is the average test result of one country, converted to 0–100. The further apart the dots, the more it pays to read the individual reports.

Dreame X50 Ultra Complete Germany: 78DEFrance: 92FRUnited Kingdom: 95UK ± 9 pts
Roborock Saros 10R USA: 81USUnited Kingdom: 90UK ± 5 pts
Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra Germany: 72DEFrance: 90FRUnited Kingdom: 90UK ± 9 pts
Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni USA: 66USGermany: 89DEUnited Kingdom: 90UK ± 12 pts
Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni Germany: 76DE ± 0 pts
Eufy Omni S1 Pro USA: 44USUnited Kingdom: 85UKGermany: 86DE ± 21 pts
Roborock Saros Z70 USA: 63USUnited Kingdom: 65UKGermany: 78DEFrance: 90FR ± 14 pts

All models in detail

Ordered by the editorial weighting. Models without an offer on file for the selected market stay in the ranking, with a note instead of a buy button.

Select two or three devices to see them side by side.
01
86 out of 100
5 tests from 3 countries · 3 of them not from the UK
Vacuuming 100
Mopping 90
Ease of use 95
  • Very good vacuuming on hard floors and carpet (Stiftung Warentest 1/2026)
  • Climbs thresholds up to 6 cm and retracts its lidar turret (TechRadar)
  • Quiet, low-maintenance dock (Presse-citron)
  • Mopping and everyday practicality only satisfactory (Stiftung Warentest)
  • Patchy object recognition, battery drains quickly (TechRadar)
Sources reviewed
DE CHIP Online 02/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de sehr gut (1,2)
DE Stiftung Warentest test 1/2026 · as reported by testberichte.de befriedigend (2,9)
FR Presse-citron 03/2025 9.2/10
UK TechRadar 07/2025 4.5/5
UK Trusted Reviews 01/2025 5/5

Details and sources →

02
86 out of 100
5 tests from 2 countries · 3 of them not from the UK
  • Flawless obstacle avoidance in testing (Vacuum Wars: 24 of 24 points)
  • Excellent hard-floor cleaning (RTINGS)
  • Low profile without a lidar turret, very quiet (TechRadar)
  • Disappointing pet hair pickup, weak on fine debris on carpet (RTINGS)
  • Expensive; no vacuum-then-mop option in the app (Trusted Reviews)
Sources reviewed
UK TechRadar 02/2025 4.5/5
UK Trusted Reviews 02/2025 4.5/5
US RTINGS 05/2025 very good choice for a household with multiple floor surfaces
US Tom's Guide Editor's Choice 4.5/5
US Vacuum Wars Vacuum Wars Stars 3.62 out of 5

Details and sources →

03
Sources disagree

Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra

83 out of 100
broadly tested 7 tests from 4 countries · 6 of them not from the UK
Vacuuming 98
Mopping 93
Navigation 90
Ease of use 94
  • Strong pickup on hard floors, good pet hair pickup (RTINGS)
  • Very good edge and corner cleaning (Trusted Reviews)
  • Stiftung Warentest 1/2025: satisfactory (3.4) – mopping unconvincing, object recognition poor
  • Dock needs a lot of space, mops rather slowly (CHIP Online)
  • High price, disposable dust bags (Clubic)
Sources reviewed
DE CHIP Online 05/2024 · as reported by testberichte.de sehr gut (1,5)
DE Stiftung Warentest test 1/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de befriedigend (3,4)
FR Clubic 04/2024 9 / 10
FR Journal du Geek 08/2024 9 /10
FR Presse-citron 06/2024 8.9/10
UK Trusted Reviews 06/2024 4.5/5
US RTINGS 02/2025 does a good job in a multi-surface household

Details and sources →

04
82 out of 100
4 tests from 3 countries · 3 of them not from the UK
  • Very effective roller mop, excellent suction and edge cleaning (TechRadar)
  • Feature-rich dock, many automatic functions (CHIP Online)
  • Very short battery life, navigation not fully reliable (CHIP Online)
  • Loud dock emptying, running costs for bags and detergent (TechRadar)
Sources reviewed
DE CHIP Online 03/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de gut (1,6)
UK TechRadar 08/2025 4.5/5
US RTINGS 01/2026 good choice for multi-surface households
US Vacuum Wars Vacuum Wars Stars 3.31 out of 5

Details and sources →

05
6 tests from 2 countries · 6 of them not from the UK
  • Balanced at Stiftung Warentest 1/2026: vacuuming rated good
  • Very strong on dried-on stains (Vacuum Wars: 158 of 184 points)
  • Very good obstacle handling on hard floors (RTINGS)
  • Mopping satisfactory, data protection only adequate (Stiftung Warentest)
  • Below-average battery life (Vacuum Wars)
  • Mediocre pet hair pickup on carpet (RTINGS)
Sources reviewed
DE NextPIT 05/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de 4 von 5 Sternen
DE Stiftung Warentest test 1/2026 · as reported by testberichte.de befriedigend (3,2)
DE Technik zu Hause.de 05/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de sehr gut (1); Spitzenklasse, Highlight
DE TopTechNews 05/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de 9 von 10 Punkten
US RTINGS 02/2026 decent choice for multi-surface households
US Vacuum Wars Best Robot Vacuum Mid-2025 The Year’s Best Right Now

Details and sources →

No offer on file for United Kingdom

The score applies regardless of market. We currently have no price for this market.

With a price in this market: Dreame X50 Ultra Complete

2 more models

06 Eufy Omni S1 Pro 4 tests · DE UK US 75
Sources disagree

Eufy Omni S1 Pro

4 tests from 3 countries · 2 of them not from the UK
  • Excellent mopping with a roller that picks up dirty water (TechRadar, Trusted Reviews)
  • Very reliable navigation, long-lasting battery, intuitive app (CHIP Online)
  • Does not mop right up to the edges (Trusted Reviews, CHIP Online)
  • Weak on carpet; lowest rating at Vacuum Wars (2.21 out of 5)
Sources reviewed
DE CHIP Online 08/2024 · as reported by testberichte.de gut (1,8)
UK TechRadar 06/2024 4/5
UK Trusted Reviews 05/2024 4.5/5
US Vacuum Wars Vacuum Wars Stars 2.21 out of 5

Details and sources →

07 Roborock Saros Z70 7 tests · DE FR UK US 74
Sources disagree

Roborock Saros Z70

broadly tested 7 tests from 4 countries · 5 of them not from the UK
Vacuuming 90
Mopping 80
Navigation 90
Ease of use 90
  • Stiftung Warentest test winner 1/2026: the only one of twelve models rated good for mopping
  • Obstacle detection well above average (Vacuum Wars: 22 of 24 points)
  • Even as test winner only “satisfactory” (2.8); handling satisfactory (Stiftung Warentest)
  • Robotic arm unreliable in automatic mode (Trusted Reviews)
  • Weak pickup on carpet (RTINGS, Vacuum Wars, Clubic)
Sources reviewed
DE CHIP CHIP 9/2025 · as reported by testberichte.de sehr gut (1,5)
DE Stiftung Warentest test 1/2026 · as reported by testberichte.de befriedigend (2,8), Testsieger
FR Clubic 05/2025 9 / 10
UK TechRadar 05/2025 3.5/5
UK Trusted Reviews 07/2025 3/5
US RTINGS 06/2025 very good performance in a household with multiple floor surfaces
US Vacuum Wars Vacuum Wars Stars 3.17 out of 5

Details and sources →

Select two or three devices to see them side by side.

All models compared

The same order in every language version. The country column shows which markets a model’s tests come from.

#ModelPointsTestsCountriesTest basisHeightMax. runtimeSuction powerPrice UK
1Dreame X50 Ultra Complete865DE · FR · UK 8,9 cm150 min20.000 Pa–
2Roborock Saros 10R865UK · US 7,98 cm180 min––
3Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra837DE · FR · UK · US broadly tested10,3 cm180 min10.000 Pa–
4Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni824DE · UK · US 9,8 cm145 min18.000 Pa–
5Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni766DE · US 9,8 cm250 min16.600 Pa–
6Eufy Omni S1 Pro754DE · UK · US 9,6 cm180 min8.000 Pa–
7Roborock Saros Z70747DE · FR · UK · US broadly tested7,98 cm180 min––

How the ranking is built →

Frequently asked questions

Where do the scores come from?

From published tests by consumer organisations, labs and specialist publications. Every product lists each source with its country, issue and original verdict, with a link where possible. We run no tests of our own.

Why do some sources say “zitiert nach” (cited from)?

Some organisations, such as Stiftung Warentest, publish their detailed results only behind a paywall. In those cases we take the overall verdict from a freely accessible report that states the grade and issue, and we name that report.

Was exactly this model tested?

Manufacturers often sell the same appliance under different model numbers or with different accessories in each country. We group variants of one model line and name the tested variant next to the test when the source states it.

Why do the verdicts differ?

Test programmes differ: labs measure things like dust pickup or durability in endurance runs, while editorial reviews weigh everyday impressions more heavily. We do not smooth over such differences; the spread chart shows them.